Wednesday, 25 April 2012

I slam, you slam, we all slam for Islam!


I SLAM, YOU SLAM, WE
ALL SLAM FOR ISLAM

-- ISLAMIC FREEDOM OF SPEECH


 ISLAMIC FREEDOM OF SPEECH
(a) Everyone  shall have the right to express his opinion freely in such manner as would not be contrary to the principles of the Shari'ah.
“ (b)  Everyone shall have the right to advocate what is right, and propagate what is good, and warn against what is wrong and evil according to the norms of Islamic Shari'ah.” *[1]

CONVERSELY,

Nobody shall have the right to advocate what is wrong, or propagate what is evil, or warn against what is right and good according to the norms of Islamic Shari'ah.  

[1

’CAUSE IF THEY DO …

OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!
ISLAMIC FREEDOM OF SPEECH




 


[1] * Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, Article 22, Aug. 5, 1990

Tuesday, 24 April 2012

_Gangstapimp Subhuman Rights_


Some highlights from the
Las Vegas Declaration on Subhuman Rights in Gangstapimp

The Nineteenth Gangstapimp Conference of Foreign Ministers (Session of Peace, Interdependence and Development), held in Las Vegas, from 9-14 Moo-Harrumph 1411H (31 July to 5 August 1990),

... Keenly aware of the place of subhumankind in Gangstapimp as vicegerent of Slugbutt on Earth;
Recognizing the importance of issuing a Document on Subhuman Rights in Gangstapimp that will serve as a guide for Member states of the Bummah in all aspects of life;

Having examined the stages through which the preparation of this draft Document has so far, passed and the relevant report of the Goatfucker General;

VITAL ROLE OF THE BUMMAH:

Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Gangstapimp Bummah which Slugbutt made as the best community and which gave subhumanity a universal and well-balanced civilization,

NO SNORING:

Snoring is expressly forbidden. ... There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in Gangstapimp Malarkey.

GANGSTAPIMP FREEDOM OF SPEECH:

Everyone shall have the right to advocate what is right, and propagate what is good, and warn against what is wrong and evil, provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey.

... (c) Information is a vital necessity to society, provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey. It may not be exploited or misused in such a way as may violate sanctities and the dignity of Bullshit Artists [i.e. messengers of Slugbutt], undermine moral and ethical Values or disintegrate, corrupt or harm society or weaken its faith, and provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey..

SOME GANGSTAPIMP SUBHUMAN RIGHTS:

...  freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey, provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of same.

... fundamental rights and freedoms according to Gangstapimp are an integral part of the Gangstapimp religion

... binding Divine Commands, which are contained in the Revealed Books of Slugbutt and which were sent through The Last of His Bullshit Artists (pbuh) to complete the preceding Divine Messages

... (a) All subhuman beings form one family whose members are united by their subordination to Slugbutt and descent from Saddam, provided they are not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey.
... (b) Life is a Slugbutt-given gift and the right to life is guaranteed to every subhuman being, provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey.

... (c) The preservation of subhuman life throughout the term of time willed by Slugbutt is a duty prescribed by Gangstapimp Malarkey, provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of same.

... so as to enable man to be acquainted with the Gangstapimp religion and uncover the secrets of the Universe for the benefit of subhumankind, provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey.

... (b) Every subhuman being has a right to receive both religious and worldly education ... develop subhuman personality … strengthen subhuman faith in Slugbutt,  provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey

... Gangstapimp is the religion of true unspoiled nature, provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey..

... there can be no subjugation but to Slugbutt the Almighty, provided it is not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey..

... unless asylum is motivated by committing an act regarded by Gangstapimp Malarkey as a crime.

ARTICLE 24: RESTRICTIONS:

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to The Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey and provided they are not contrary to same.

ARTICLE 25: SOURCES

The Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey are the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration, provided they are not contrary to the Eternal Principles of Gangstapimp Malarkey.

SOME SNAPSHOTS OF HOW GANGSTAPIMP FREEDOM OF SPEECH ENCOURAGES MEMBERS OF THE BUMMAH TO TAKE PART IN VIGOROUS PUBLIC DEBATE REGARDING  ISSUES OF GENERAL CONCERN:

GANGSTAPIMP FREEDOM OF SPEECH
 This is not a hate web site. Rather, it is a contempt web site.


Saturday, 14 April 2012

Abu Grouch




Little do these righteous warriors of Allah suspect that there is a scheming agent of Shaytan in their midst! Slaughterfaith -
Review of Clinical Islamunacy

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Attenuated Multiculturalism®

His Exalted Event Horizon
A dramatic new cultural-policy initiative 
from the brilliant mind 
of the Supreme Despot 
of the Servants of Nebuchadnezzar
under the slogan “Beyond Palæo-Multiculturalism!“

by The Bali Putra, M.Sc.

Abstract: This breakthrough new conceptual model will reinvigorate the multiculturalism movement and at the same time make it more acceptable to the  public at large.

This new buzzword, Attenuated Multiculturalism®, is a brand-new proposal dished up by my Council of Sages. I hereby reveal it to an awed world.

The key concept behind Attenuated Multiculturalism® is its, so to speak, “variable-geometry” feature that makes it so inherently flexi-poo. Attenuated Multiculturalism® has also been called “Multiculturalism Minus One”.

The truly ingenious thing about Attenuated Multiculturalism® is that it does not crudely lump all cultures a priori into the same category, as did Palæo-Multiculturalism in its day. Pride of place in Attenuated Multiculturalism®’s methodological toolbox is its fresh new approach to defining the scope of multi-culti shenanigans.

Attenuated Multiculturalism® is the answer to the  question “Which cultures are a nuisance?”

The structure of Attenuated Multiculturalism® is determined in two stages, to wit:

  1. The population of the territory concerned is entreated to ponder which are the most worthy and the most unworthy cultures.
  2. After the issue has been thoroughly debated for six months, an election is held to exclude one or more cultures from the circle of the elect.
  3. Then multi-culti happens, to the  exclusion of the cultures deemed unworthy.

Even if no election is held, the public debate on the issue “Which cultures are a nuisance?” should rearrange priorities.

The Bali Putra has spoken. Long live the Bali Putra!



Monday, 9 April 2012

Slavery is better than freedom!





UNDERSTANDING ISLAM


Another instance of Mohammedan doubletalk

One of the most prominent thinkers, if one can use that  term, of the Mohammedan world is worthy of mention. He wrote a best-selling commentary on the Koran called In the Shade of the Koran  that is read by many faithful and presumably exerts great influence. I write of Sayyid Qutb.

His commentary is characterized by crude thinking and extreme concepts. He writes that a Mohammedan who is ruled by a non-Mohammedan government is a “slave”. Note the lack of gradations. It is not a question of a Mohammedan under alien rule being irked and inconvenienced, even harassed and oppressed. No, there are only two possible situations: either Mohammedans rule or they are slaves. Please note that Sayyid Qutb was writing about Mohammedans living under freedom of religion as is normal in secular, democratic societies.  

On the other hand when Sayyid Qutb writes of his ideal Mohammedan society, he claims that it offers freedom of religion to non-Mohammedans. However what  he calls “freedom of religion” is dhimmi status, which is hedged in by all kinds of restrictions under the Pact of Omar. No repairing churches, no preaching to Mohammedans, humility toward Mohammedans. If any of these rules are broken, not only the transgressor, but the whole of the transgressor’s dhimmi  community may be punished, even massacred. 

So the status that Sayyid Qutb calls “slavery” when enjoyed by a Mohammedan, is far, far better than the “freedom” that Sayyid Qutb and Islam offer us non-Mohammedan dhimmis who will populate the nether reaches of his splendid Korangutan utopia..

Slavery is better than freedom! That’s Korangutan logic for you. 
Review of Clinical Islamunacy - Slaughterfaith

Saturday, 7 April 2012

Sayyid Qutb -- Fascist dirtbag extraordinaire





Review of Clinical Islamunacy - Slaughterfaith

By Igor Slamoff

A pre-review of John Calvert’s Sayyid Qutb and the Origins of Radical Islamism

I have not yet read the book, but having read the reviews and excerpts therefrom, I would like to make these preliminary remarks, subject to correction or amendment once I have read the complete biography.

Calvert's bio of Sayyid Qutb is sympathetic. Uh-oh.

To quote one review of Calvert’s bio, “Lacking a pure understanding of the leader's life and work, the popular media has conflated Qutb's moral purpose with the aims of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda. He is often portrayed as a terrorist, Islamo-Fascist, and advocate of murder. An expert on social protest and political resistance, John Calvert rescues Qutb from misrepresentation and follows the evolution of his thought within the context of his time.”

John Calvert would be perfect as a biographer of Dr. Josef Goebbels, Hitler’s Reichsminister für Propaganda, who perished by his own hand in the Berlin Führerbunker after poisoning his eight children, shortly before the bunker was overrun by Red Army infantry in May 1945. Calvert’s understanding and compassionate approach would reveal to the reader how Goebbels has been maligned by history and was actually a kindly family man, owned a cocker spaniel and used to go sailing on the Krumme Lanke.

Even the most cursory reading of Sayyid Qutb’s works reveals that throughout his life Qutb was a pathological liar and a bloodthirsty fanatic, just like Dr. Goebbels. The same demented frenzy dominates Qutb’s mendacious account of the US written around 1950 and the fanatical exhortations of In the Shade of the Koran written in the 1960s.

The naïf reader may suspect that the author, John Calvert, is counting on an Islamist takeover of America and is playing it safe in order to ingratiate himself with the Islamafia that may soon rule us. It would be more charitable to point out that any expert on the Middle East must feign approval or at least tolerance of Mohammedan mumbo-jumbo in order to obtain  access to Moslem sources and assure his/her own survival when traveling in the Middle East, a region notoriously rife with fanatical Mohammedan hitmen. Accordingly any criticism of islam expressed by an academic expert must be tactful to the point of obsequiousness. Any brusque remark might trigger the end of his/her academic career and/or his/her biological life span.

I myself – despite my frequent and intemperate outbursts against Korangutan malarkey -- can travel unhampered throughout the Middle East because I have taken the precaution of writing under a pseudonym.  The drawback to this gambit is that I cannot easily embark on an academic career as an islamologist, at least not under my nom de guerre.

Reviewers ignorant of this existential dilemma in which islamologists find themselves fail to read between the lines and accordingly take everything literally. A grave mistake.

Having read a substantial chunk of Qutb’s ravings, I have not the slightest hesitation in concurring with “the popular media” that Qutb was indeed a precursor of Osama bin Laden and of al-Qaeda and that he was indeed a terrorist, an Islamo-Fascist, and an advocate of murder.

Any objection to this characterization of Sayyid Qutb can consist only of verbal quibble and elegant sophistries, which Calvert is extremely adept at disgorging.

One reviewer calls Calvert an “expert on social protest and political resistance”. That sounds very much as if Calvert were an eager apologist for any crackpot with an axe to grind. Sayyid Qutb may have done oodles of social protesting and political resistance, but that is not sufficient to exalt him into a saintly or prophetic figure.

That is because Sayyid Qutb was first and foremost a bullshit artist of the most sordid stripe. This condition was evidently inborn, because as I pointed out earlier, the same foaming-at-the-mouth dogmatism and shameless lying are evident in his early scribbles as in his late scribbles, to say nothing of his intermediate scribbles.

Furthermore I can point to the exact pages of his wretched œuvre that prove my point. I refer the inquisitive reader to several brief reviews I have written on Sayyid Qutb's works that can be read in my blog www.prophetless.blogspot.com, to wit
  1. Sayyid Qutb's lies about America,
  2. Psychopathology of islamic homicidal frenzy,
  3. Islam vs. Free speech,
  4. Islam makes you stupid,
and others.


Slaughterfaith - Review of Clinical Islamunacy




Friday, 6 April 2012

Islam vs. Free speech

QUR'ANIC EXEGESIS

by Igor Slamoff

As part of my project of discovering the eternal truths of islam through the writings of its sages, today I comment on the following passage written around 1960 by the noted Mohammedan crackpot Sayyid Qutb:

“They [i.e., hypocrites] delude themselves into thinking that they are so clever and cunning as to be able to deceive the ‘naive’ believers, but God uncovers the truth about their actions. They are trying to deceive not only believers, but God Himself: “They seek to deceive God and the believers.” (Verse 9)

“This and similar Qur’ānic verses reveal a great truth and an honour that God has bestowed on believers, for they emphasize the special relationship He has with them. God always takes the believers’ side and makes their concern His concern. He protects them and stands against their enemy, and repels any attacks directed at them. This great honour elevates the status of believers among the rest of mankind, and affirms the fact that belief in God is the noblest and most honourable of all concepts in this life. It is the source of boundless reassurance to the believer that God supports his cause, nurtures him and fights on his side. The scheming and intrigue of other mortals is not to be feared.

“This statement also carries a stiff warning to those who seek to deceive believers, harm them or scheme against them. It tells them that they will have to confront not only believers, but God Almighty. Waging war against believers means having to fight against God Himself and face His wrath and His retribution.”

Sayyid Qutb: In the Shade of the Qur'ān, volume 1, p 39

Igor Slamoff comments:

“To deceive believers” evidently means to dispute Mohammedan mumbo-jumbo. Islam is thus assumed to be the truth, and any questioning of islam is automatically an act of deception.

“God always takes the believers’ side and … protects them and stands against their enemy, and repels any attacks directed at them.”

So criticism of islam is the same thing as attacking Moslems. Both activities are presumably deemed to be instances of “Islamophobia”.

Furthermore “This great honour [i.e. that allegedly “God always takes the believers’ side”] elevates the status of believers among the rest of mankind”.

Thus Moslems are inherently superior to other humans, and presumably should have no compunction about massacring them.

“The scheming and intrigue of other mortals [i.e. criticizing islam] is not to be feared. This statement also carries a stiff warning to those who seek to deceive believers, harm them or scheme against them.”

Note that once again “to deceive believers” [i.e. disputing Mohammedan mumbo-jumbo] is considered equivalent to harming Moslems or scheming against them.

Not only that, but disputing Korangutan malarkey is also by implication equivalent to “waging war against” Moslems. Moreover disputing Mohammedan mumbo-jumbo “means having to fight against God Himself …”

Sayyid Qutb winds up his thuggish rant by threatening skeptics not only with being murdered by fanatical Mohammedans, but with eternal torment in the hereafter.

This fanatical tirade denies any possibility of free discussion of religious (or political) matters. Any difference of opinion is deemed a casus belli. Disagreements inevitably become pitched battles to the death.
One is reminded of a news item from Beirut from October 2010:


The four-hour street clash began as a row over a parking space but swiftly escalated into a full-fledged battle with machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades that killed three, including Hezbollah official Mohammed Fawaz.

The clash again put widespread armament in Beirut in the limelight and raised fears of a repeat of May 2008, when gunmen supporting a Hezbollah-led alliance clashed with Druze and Sunni supporters of a rival alliance, killing 100 people in a week-long battle.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0, 7340, L-

An unbiased observer must reach the conclusion that (s)he is risking his/her life by saying anything contrary to Mohammedan mumbo-jumbo. This conclusion is supported by the countless murders committed by Mohammedan fanatics over the centuries against those who dared question the infantile nonsense they profess.


Accordingly, whenever one detects any difference of opinion between oneself and a Moslem on matters of faith (I'm not sure about disputes concerning parking space), it would seem that the only prudent course of action is to cut to the chase and blow the Mohammedan’s head off without further ado.


You can plead self-defense. 

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

ALLAH'S STANDING IN RUSSIA

by Ibn Adolf

Sayyid Qutb was bullshitting us, as usual

Sayyid Qutb: “… the Russian people themselves continue to indicate that deep at heart they yearn to have a faith based on belief in God.”
Sayyid Qutb: In the Shade of the Qur'ān   volume 5 pp 122-123

Sayyid Qutb wrote in the 1960s or so, a time when Russia was ruled by atheistic Communists who discouraged displays of religious piety. But in 1991 communism collapsed and nowadays in Russia religion is as free as it's ever been. Consequently this is the right moment to test Sayyid Qutb’s claims empirically. 

Statistics from 2007 show that Sayyid Qutb was bullshitting us, as usual. In Europe the Russians scored lowest on the religion scale, after the incredulous French.

Percentage of people who said
religion was "very important" in their lives.
Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, 2007

Percentage
Country
11
France
14
Russia
14
Bohemia
21
Germany
27
Italy
33
Great Britain
36
Poland