Saturday, 31 December 2011

The wisdom of Islam: fashion = bullfighting

Drinking is  no different from gambling, sporting events, speed races, cinema, fashion and bull fighting.

Sayyid Qutb In the Shade of the Koran, volume 3 (surah 4) p 137

Igor Slamoff comments:

Applying the same logic, Sayyid Qutb is no different from a smelly baboon.

The complete passage is as follows:

Like gambling and other such fun, drinking is a craze[1], which is not really different from any other craze, such as sporting events, speed races, cinema, fashion and bull fighting. These are simply a manifestation of a spiritual emptiness reflected in the absence of faith and a lack of high concern consuming one’s energy. They are, in themselves, evidence of the bankruptcy of modern civilisation that finds itself unable to fulfil natural needs and to tap the natural resources of man in a clean, healthy way. It is such emptiness and bankruptcy that leads people to fill the vacuum they feel in their lives with wine and gambling. What is more, these social diseases are not only the cause of perversion but also of mental and nervous disorders.
p 137

Igor Slamoff comments: So any amusement except reciting the Koran is just a waste of time. And cinema and fashion are not clean or healthy, but instead reflect “spiritual emptiness.” Strange that he failed to include music and figurative painting and sculpture, which are also on the Korangutan shit-list.

What a horse’s ass!

[1]  Lousy fucking translation! A  ”craze” means a fad, a passing fashion, which is evidently not what the author had in mind. More likely he meant “madness, lunacy, craziness".

Thursday, 29 December 2011

Sayyid Qutb’s Lies about America

by Igor Slamoff

This is a commentary on some of the more egregious horse-shit spewed by the Mohammedan fanatic Sayyid Qutb in 1951, purporting to describe his recent 2-year stay in the US of A.

I would like to preface my remarks by stressing that I am not American and have no emotional attachment to the  country. I strive to be as objective as I can both about America and about the Mohammedan cult that so obsessed Sayyid Qutb.

When criticizing Sayyid Qutb I do not feel as if I were defending America, but rather merely defending the historical truth, which knows no loyalty to land or faith. I strive to be as objective as possible in my assessment. However once my conclusion on a particular issue has been reached, I do not hesitate to express my personal opinion.

Page 5:  “The deformed birth of American man.“

Cite: “In America, man was born with science, and thus believed in it alone.”

 Comment: Sayyid Qutb ignores the fact that many Americans belong to various religions and sects, and that religious faith is more intense in the US than in most other Western countries.    

Cite: “In fact, he only believed in one kind of science, and that was applied science.”

Comment: If this means that in the US applied science has been cultivated to the  exclusion of pure science, then it is a blatant lie. As a matter of fact the US has traditionally been a leader in pure science.  This is no coincidence, because conducting only applied scientific research cannot  be the basis for long-term technical innovation, which is an activity at which Americans excel.

Page 5:  “The origin  of the Americans.”

Cite: “[the] first waves of immigrants … were composed of … adventurers …  and criminals. The adventurers came seeking wealth, pleasure and adventure, while the criminals were brought to this land … as labor for construction and production."

Comment: I do not claim to be an authority on American history, but this is certainly news to me. When writing of “criminals” he seems to be confusing the US with Australia. I know of no British penal settlements in North America.

The description of the "adventurers” well fits the Catholic Spaniards who were indeed the first Europeans to arrive, but who made no permanent impression on the country’s culture or society. Lands deeply marked by Spanish influence began to be incorporated into the US only around the 1830s (Texas), when the country’s character had already been largely fixed in a Protestant, English-speaking mold. The US was largely fashioned by the Protestant ethic, which stresses hard work, frugality and honesty. Sayyid Qutb makes nary a mention of the Protestant sects that so deeply marked the early immigrants.

To save time, I shall merely quote my own remarks (in Psychopathology of Islamic Homicidal Frenzy) on Sayyid Qutb’s outlandish claims about 19th century European history, namely that these inaccurate and highly biased statements show “either profound ignorance or monumental mendacity, most likely both.” Moreover it should be noted that this ideological twaddle appears before he even starts to describe his stay in America.   

I'm getting tired of reading this Mohammedan horse-shit. I'll take a break. Perhaps some other day I shall persevere in my perusal of this obnoxious crackpot. And perhaps not.

Correct interpretation of Mohammedan horse-shit

There follows some idiotic twaddle about the first chunk of the Koran that I downloaded from a Korangutan web site. Then I translate it into colloquial English.

3. Bukhaaree reports from ibn Abbaas (May Allah be pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allah (Peace and Blessings be upon him) said, If, when one of you wishes to go to his wife [for sexual intercourse] says, ‘With the Name of Allah, O Allah! Protect us from the Shaytaan and keep the Shaytaan away from what You will provide us.’ Then if it is decreed that they should have a child out of that act then the Shaytaan will never be able to harm him. [Saheeh Bukhaaree [Eng. Trans. 1/105 no. 143], Saheeh Muslim [Eng. Trans. 2/731 no. 3361]]


Scrotum-Face said, “Whenever you fuck your old lady, you must first say “Yo, Allah! Protect us from Satan and keep him away from the zygote.”  This is a sure-fire way of protecting any ensuing brat from Satan.

This feeble-minded crap is par for the course in Mohammedan Horse-Shit. No wonder Goat-fuckers are such idiots. 

Wednesday, 28 December 2011

Is Shitslamophobia a blessing in disguise?

Haven't written the article yet, but you ve got to admit it's a terrific title!

How can an “Islamophobe” be sure he’s kicking a Moslem?

Tackling Islamophobia: Reducing Street Violence Against British Muslims’
 Press Release from The Muslim Council of Britain

The Muslim Council of Britain hosted a special closed-meeting to discuss the growing spate of attacks in all its forms against British Muslims on March 3rd at the Grand Committee Room of the House of Commons.

Igor Slamoff remarks: It seems that Mohammedans in Britain are in the habit of wearing certain articles of clothing or adornments that identify them as Goat-fuckers. That is what makes them targets of attack. They should learn from Dutch and French Jews, who have learned to conceal their Jewish identity in public, at least in areas where fanatical Mohammedans abound.

Prominent VVD politician Frits Bolkestein believes there is no future for 'active' Jews in the Netherlands. The conservative politician made his remarks in an interview with freesheet De Pers.
In the interview, Mr Bolkestein says that when he talks about active Jews he means those who are recognisable as such, for instance Orthodox Jews. The former EU Commissioner says there is no future for this group in the Netherlands because of "the anti-Semitism among Dutchmen of Moroccan descent, whose numbers keep growing''.
He feels that this group of Jews should encourage their children to emigrate to either the United States or Israel, because he has little confidence in the effectiveness of the government's proposals for fighting anti-Semitism.
Earlier, Mr Bolkestein made similar statements in Het Verval (The Decline) by Manfred Gerstenberg, a recently published book about Jews in the Netherlands. Frits Bolkestein was political leader of the current coalition party VVD between 1990 en 1998. He later served as European Commissioner from 1999 until 2004.
© Radio Netherlands Worldwide

Learning from Sayyid Qutb

Unless an atheist publicly ignores Shari’a, inevitably he will be forced to blaspheme privately and isolate himself spiritually. His relations with others are not fully secular because his blasphemy is confined to a circle of fellow unbelievers. He cannot publicly defy Shari’a. So to refrain from publicly mocking Korangutan malarkey is a form of slavery.

To refrain from publicly mocking
Korangutan malarkey  
is a form of slavery.

Psychopathology of Islamic Homicidal Frenzy

The hard facts of life compel Islam to keep its sword drawn and be incessantly on its guard. 
-- Sayyid Qutb

Islam = ideology of genocide driven by systemic paranoia

– Igor Slamoff

Typically, Sayyid Qutb fails to mention a single one of the so-called “hard facts of life” that supposedly “compel” Mohammedans to behave like maniacs. [1] As a matter of fact Qutb’s ravings dispense with facts almost entirely, whether they be of the “hard” or the soft variety. 

Although Sayyid Qutb  seldom mentions facts, when he occasionally does make a verifiable statement about reality purporting to be a fact, he invariably reveals himself to be a pathological liar. An example is his claim that in the 19th century “an unholy alliance between Christian imperialism and Zionism was forged”.[2]

That claim is quite simply a stupendous lie, an outrageous chunk of Islamo-horseshit.

The history of the Zionist movement displays an ambivalent attitude toward European/”Christian” imperialism at best. After all, Zionism arose as a reaction against anti-Semitism, which was propagated by many European Christians, with great fluctuations over both space and time. Furthermore there was no European, let alone ”Christian” imperialism as such but instead a bevy of European imperialisms: German, French, British, Russian, Belgian, Dutch, etc., all at odds with each other.

By the same token Sayyid Qutb’s breezy assumption that  dozens of mutually distrustful Christian sects were able to agree on making an alliance with anybody, let alone with the Zionists, shows either profound ignorance or monumental mendacity, most likely both. 

The Orthodox Christian rulers of the Russian Empire, for example, were rabid anti-Semites and to accuse them of being in league with Zionists is a classic symptom of Islamic delirium.

The Jewish settlement and eventual conquest of Palestine in the 20th century was constantly thwarted by the British Empire, which was prone to kowtow to Arab public opinion and at times severely restricted Jewish immigration to Palestine so as not to offend the Arabs. Throughout the 1940s Zionists guerrillas actually made war on British troops in Palestine.  

If there were any alliances between Zionism and any European imperialism, they were fleeting, tactical and tacit.

Consequently we must conclude that the alleged “alliance” between Christianity and Zionism is merely a projection (in the Freudian sense) of Qutb’s galloping Islamo-paranoia onto the stage of world history.[3]

Sayyid Qutb thus displays the characteristic that distinguishes all genuine bullshit artists, like Charles Maurras and Adolf Hitler: factlessness, a complete lack of empirical support.  

Or perhaps one of the “hard facts” is Qutb’s  bizarre claim that being governed by jahili institutions is the same as slavery. This completely gratuitous statement is plainly contradicted by a comparison of the dictionary definitions of “government” and “slavery”.

If I start from the premise that fleas are the same thing as rhinoceroses, nobody should be astonished if I go to bed toting a big-game rifle, or go on safari armed only with bug spray.

Thus the notorious Islamic propensity for bloodshed lacks any cogent basis in reality; Qutb’s feverish discourse is merely a manifestation of the absurd nature of his initial assumptions. 

Or as a systems analyst would say: garbage in, garbage out.

[1] “It is not that Islam loves to draw its sword and chop off people’s heads with it. The hard facts of life compel Islam to keep its sword drawn and be incessantly on its guard.” In the Shade of the Qur’an, vol.3, pg. 282. My translation. [p. 243 volume 3 (surah 4) pdf ed.]  The relevant passage reads:

The assumption must never be made that jihad was only incidental to a particular
situation in a particular place, and that that situation no longer exists. It is not that
Islam loves to draw its sword and chop off people’s heads with it.  The hard facts of life compel Islam to keep its sword drawn and be incessantly on its guard. God knows that those who hold the reins of power are hostile to Islam. …This … applies to the situation today and tomorrow, in all places and throughout all generations.  [my emphasis]

Igor Slamoff comments:

To state that god X or god Y “knows” something is an unverifiable claim. Consequently it cannot be called a “fact”.

On the other hand “those who hold the reins of power are hostile to Islam" is indeed a verifiable statement. However if it “applies to the situation today and tomorrow, in all places and throughout all generations,” that means that amongst many others who “held the reins of power”, the Prophet Mohammed and the  rightly guided Caliphs were “hostile to Islam”. That is quite evidently A LIE OF COLOSSAL PROPORTIONS. Hence it too fails to qualify as a fact.
[2] … an unholy alliance between Christian imperialism and Zionism was forged.” Hendrik Hanzen and Peter Kainz, “Radical Islamism and Totalitarian Ideology: a Comparison of Sayyid Qutb's Islamism with Marxism and National Socialism,” Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, Vol. 8, No. 1, Mar. 2007, p. 61.
[3] Please note that none of my statements on this issue should be construed as being applicable to relations between Zionism and US imperialism, which are a horse of an entirely different color.  

Monday, 19 December 2011


On dealing with primitive stone-age superstitions

By our Neolithic correspondent Infidel Kastrovic

Time Magazine, in its official bleat of submission to the barbarian cultthroats who fire-bombed Charlie Hebdo’s offices, makes, among other cretinous remarks, the following one:

Okay, so can we finally stop with the idiotic, divisive, and destructive efforts by “majority sections” of Western nations to bait Muslim members with petulant, futile demonstrations that “they” aren't going to tell “us” what can and can't be done in free societies? Because not only are such Islamophobic antics futile and childish, but they also openly beg for the very violent responses from extremists their authors claim to proudly defy in the name of common good. What common good is served by creating more division and anger, and by tempting belligerent reaction?
My reply is as follows:

Devotees of primitive stone age superstitions like Islam are not noted for their subtlety. The only way to ward off their persistent snarling encroachments on our freedoms is to exercise such freedoms to the utmost, in a wanton, blatant, provocative, in-your-face and irrepressible manner. Any less forceful response will just bounce off their armor-plated egos like a rubber ball.

Consequently the only reasonable way of proceeding with these moral pygmies is to mock and ridicule their crude superstitions as offensively, as shrilly and as deafeningly as we can.

If they reply with violence we will fight back, and them some!

Our motto is:


Sunday, 4 December 2011


Korangutans doing their thing

by Genghis Cohn

Kit Kittredge’s (of Code Pink) article on AlterNet with the title 'Freedom Waves' (November 2011) makes justified charges against Israel for various illegal and inhumane policies that it practices toward Gaza and its population. For example, despite Judge Goldstone’s coerced retraction of his report, no sensible person denies that Israeli troops committed various war crimes when they invaded Gaza in 2009 in reprisal for rocket attacks against Israel (“Operation Cast Lead”).

Then, of course, there is the harsh Israeli blockade of Gaza, which has led to a decline in the stanard of living there. Kittredge writes an account of a failed attempt to breach the Israeli naval blockade. The Israeli navy appears to have learned from its mistakes and no deaths were registered this time.

However Kittredge’s article is MUCH TOO ONE-SIDED. It completely ignores the many and grievous breaches of human rights and rule of law by the Korangutan Hamas régime that controls Gaza.

A balanced article would explain, among other things, that*

• Human Rights Watch documented numerous Hamas abuses against Gaza civilians during Operation Cast Lead, including the execution of 32 political rivals, shooting of 49 persons in the legs, and breaking the limbs of 73 others.
• Hamas demonstrated a reckless disregard for the population during its putsch against the PA in June 2006
• During the coup Hamas’s actions were characterized by “extra-judicial and wilful killing”
•Torture and the like:
o The leader of Hamas’s Executive Force, Jamal Jarrah, admitted to torture
o The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights documented Hamas torture,
o Hamas arrested the director of Gaza’s electric company, and held him without formal charges for six months
o Hamas abducted political rivals, and set them loose again only after shaving their heads.
Dismantling and replacement of the judiciary: As the PA judicial system in Gaza collapsed, sharia courts became the primary arbiters of disputes.
o Hamas established courts run by the so-called “Palestine Islamic Scholars Association”. In many cases, their judgments were Hamas’s political edicts. The association ruled that a health workers’ strike, in protest of Hamas rule, violated Islamic law
o Hamas, claiming it was dismantling networks of Israeli “collaborators,” sentenced several Palestinians to death for collaborating with Israel. Observers noted a “lack of adequate evidence.”
o Gaza’s top judge in July 2009 ordered all female lawyers to wear headscarves when they appear in court. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights called the move a “dangerous violation of personal freedoms and women’s rights”
After its 2006 putsch Hamas began openly to mistreat the minority Christian community
o Masked gunmen attacked the Rosary Sisters School and the Latin Church in Gaza City with rocket-propelled grenades.
o There were more than 50 attacks against Christian targets in the aftermath of the Hamas coup, including barbershops, music stores, and a U.N. school
o Gunmen blew up the YMCA library in the Gaza Strip
o A Hamas “modesty patrol” attacked a Christian youth’s car after he drove home a female classmate
Egregious breaches of personal freedoms:
o Hamas imposed sharia law and deploys religious police to enforce these laws.
o The Korangutan vice squads were not new; they had operated in Hamas-controlled neighbourhoods in Gaza and the West Bank for years
o In June 2007, vice squads bombed a pool hall, as well as a tiny shop selling popular Arab music recordings
o Other targets included internet cafes and pharmacies.
o Hamas forces policed the streets for couples walking together, and took it upon themselves to verify their marital status.
o As attacks increased, so did the number of men who grew beards and women who wore veils. Many reportedly chose these expressions of Islamic piety out of fear rather than conviction
Numerous violations of free speech and press freedom:
o Hamas announced on television the “end of secularism and heresy in the Gaza Strip”
o The Korangutan Hamas closed down opposition television and radio stations
o Hamas gunmen attacked two cameramen from the Abu Dhabi satellite television channel
o Hamas gunmen stormed the Gaza bureau of the al-Arabiya satellite channel.
o Hamas detained a German television crew after it shot footage portraying Hamas in a negative light.
o Hamas issued a ban on phrases such as “Hamas militias” and “ousted government”.
o Hamas regularly threatens and blackmails reporters
o Contrary to what Hamas’ leaders say, journalists are not free to criticize the Islamist movement, to communicate the stance of other factions, or simply to set forth divergent opinions.
o Most journalists share this point if view, but none of them can express themselves publicly, so great is the risk of reprisals
• The Muslim Brotherhood, for its part, and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), identified by the FBI as the Muslim Brotherhood’s front organization in America, have largely remained silent regarding Hamas’s continued violation of human rights in Gaza
• Indeed, while the Brotherhood remained silent during two years of misrule in Gaza, the organization’s leader, Mohammed Mahdi Akef, called upon his supporters to launch a jihad for the Palestinians in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead.
• CAIR launched a 2008 campaign advocating an end to Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip,” but has remained silent on the issue of Hamas’s Korangutan misrule in the beleaguered territory.
• In other words, Kittredge and her fellow-“freebies” are imitating the cynical Korangutan policy of the Hamas front in the US, CAIR.

All this raises the following questions:

• Which is the major threat to freedom in Gaza?
• Who exercises oppression in Gaza?
• Who opposes civil liberties in Gaza?
• Who violates human rights in Gaza?

Obviously, there are 2 answers to these questions;

1. IN FIRST PLACE, HAMAS, the Mohammedan terror gang. And
2. IN SECOND PLACE but lagging far behind, ISRAEL.

Against whom are the actions of the Free Gaza Movement directed?

Against the number 2 oppressor, Israel.
NOT against the no. 1 oppressor, the Islamo-Fascist Korangutan Hamas gang.

Clearly the adjective “free” in the name “Free Gaza Movement” and those of its clones is being used in an intentionally deceptive way, since the primary enemy of freedom in Gaza is obviously Hamas, and Israel plays merely a secondary role in oppressing Gazans. However, all FGM’s acts are directed against Israel, and none against Hamas.

Consequently FGM and its clones, possibly including Code Pink, must be considered phony front organizations for the Islamo-Fascist Hamas terror gang.

See Talibanization of Gaza, by Jonathan Schanzer